No refund policy cost business $10,000 (Agrilube Fluid Management / David Ashwell)
All announcements issued prior to 1 July 2017 were issued by the former Department of Commerce. Announcements listed here are the latest versions available, but may be subject to review. For more information on this announcement, please contact email@example.com.
A Geraldton phone shop and its Director have been ordered to pay a total of $10,000 for three charges of breaching the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
The company failed to provide a customer with information about their right to return a faulty item on two occasions and misled the customer on their right to get a refund.
In this case, a customer purchased an iPhone then reported it was difficult to hear caller’s voices; the phone was replaced with another similarly faulty phone. When the customer requested a refund, they were told they did not have a right to one because the company’s warranty only covered replacement or repair. Additionally, they were not given any information at any time about their rights under the ACL.
Agrilube Fluid Management Pty Ltd, trading as Fone Fix, was fined $4,000 with an additional $2,000 in court costs. The business’ Director, David Michael Ashwell, who was also the salesperson, received a $2,000 fine and was ordered to pay $2,000 in costs. The Court also ordered that the company pay $506 to the consumer involved as restitution to cover the money which should have been refunded.
Acting Commissioner for Consumer Protection, Gary Newcombe, said that regardless of any warranties that traders may offer voluntarily, consumers must be notified of their rights under the ACL.
“If a business gives to a consumer a document, such as a tax invoice which sets out a warranty against defects, the ACL requires that the document must include a prescribed notice that tells consumers about their rights under the ACL. This ensures there is a balance in bargaining power between consumers and traders,” Mr Newcombe said.
“If a trader tells a consumer, at the point of sale, that they can only get a repair or exchange if the good is defective, but fails to advise of other rights that exist under the ACL, then the consumer is left with the impression that the trader is simply adding value to the purchase by volunteering to fix a defective product.
“In fact, the trader is obliged under the legislation to address problems if goods are not fit for the purpose for which they are sold; or are not of an acceptable quality. Consumer Protection had previously tried to resolve the complaint on behalf of the consumer to no avail”.
END OF RELEASE
Media contact (Consumer Protection)
Share this page: