Serious chemical burns result in $47,900 penalty for principal employer Rand Transport

Office closure

Our offices will close from Monday 24 December 2018 and will reopen on Thursday 3 January 2019. For urgent assistance during that period you can contact us.

Rand Transport (1986) Pty Ltd was handed a $45,000 fine and a $2900 costs penalty in the Perth Magistrate Court following serious ammonia gas burns to a contract worker.

Rand, a cold storage food distributor, pleaded guilty to failing to provide and maintain a safe workplace where contractors were not exposed to hazards.

On 11 December 2014, during the construction of a dividing wall within a large cold storage room, Luke Passmore - a contractor for Bondor, was sprayed in the face with ammonia liquid and gas as it was released from a purge valve.

Mr Passmore suffered serious chemical burns to his eyes, face and severe internal respiratory damage.

The purge valve was part of a live, forced air cooler unit suspended from the ceiling.

Mr Passmore was operating a scissor lift at height, within a small restricted space. As he manoeuvred the lift, it struck the valve on the unit, releasing the pressurised toxic refrigeration chemical.

The WorkSafe Commissioner Ian Munns said today Rand knew the chemical was in the vicinity of the works and had not advised Bondor or their workers about the hazards or the risks.

“The duty of care is extended to all people working for contracting organisations, including those from labour hire firms, and even passers-by,” Mr Munns said.

“Providing the necessary information, delivering the proper inductions and appropriate training is an absolute occupational safety and health basic for every person in control of a workplace.

“This is an easy safety measure for employers to implement.

“Rand has taken the necessary steps after this young man was injured. Those measures should have already been in place.

“It was the responsibility of Rand to make sure Mr Passmore understood the need to maintain a safe distance.

 “With proper risk assessment and appropriate controls like providing the correct working space, isolating the unit, using protective structures and attaching warning labels and signs, this accident would have been avoided,” Mr Munns said.

<ENDS>

WorkSafe
Media release
30 May 2018

Share this page:

Last modified: